π Decoda raises $4.5M, led by Y Combinator. Read more
Every practice has this argument, and most settle it twice a month in a spreadsheet nobody trusts. The answer should be a rule you wrote once, not a negotiation at pay period close.
The actual question
A six-session package gets sold once and delivered six times, often by different people. Most systems only know who rang it up, which is why the split-credit fight never ends. A rule here names the payee explicitly.
Tiers
Graduated pays each band its own rate. Stepwise pays every sale at the highest band reached. On the same three tiers those produce very different paychecks, and most practices have never made the choice deliberately β the spreadsheet just did whatever it did.
The number underneath
A 20% promo shouldn't quietly cost the practice twice β once on the discount and again on a commission calculated as if it never happened. Rules pay on what was actually collected, unless you decide otherwise.
When it's earned
A package sold today is delivered over months, and the two people involved reasonably expect to be paid on different clocks. Each rule carries its own recognition basis, so both can run in the same pay period without a manual adjustment.
Scope
A single blanket percentage is why comp plans stop reflecting the business. Rules target what they should β everything, a category, a type of item, or one specific service β and apply to the providers you assign them to.